• About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
Strategic Wealth Pro
Advertisement
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stocks
No Result
View All Result
  • Business
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Stocks
No Result
View All Result
Strategic Wealth Pro
No Result
View All Result
Home Politics

White House criticizes judge’s decision not to unseal Epstein associate grand jury testimony

August 13, 2025
in Politics
0
White House criticizes judge’s decision not to unseal Epstein associate grand jury testimony
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The White House criticized a judge’s decision not to unseal grand jury materials related to the sex trafficking case against Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell, calling the ruling ‘unfortunate.’ 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt made the remark after U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer on Monday shot down the motion filed by the Justice Department, finding the documents do not contain ‘significant, undisclosed information about [their] crimes, or the investigation into them.’ 

‘We think that decision is unfortunate. Of course, we moved to unseal that information because the president has said he wants to see credible evidence released. As for the appeal process, I would defer you to the Department of Justice for that,’ Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday. 

Last month, President Donald Trump said he supported Attorney General Pam Bondi releasing ‘credible’ files from Epstein’s sex trafficking case, noting that ‘She’s handled it very well, and it’s going to be up to her, whatever she thinks is credible she should release.’ 

Engelmayer wrote in his 31-page opinion that only two ‘features’ of the grand jury evidence were noteworthy, summarizing them in his decision: 

‘First, the grand juries in this case were not used for investigative purposes,’ he wrote. ‘They did not hear testimony from any firsthand witness to any event at issue. They did not hear testimony from any victim, eyewitness, suspect, or even a records custodian. The grand juries met instead for the quotidian purpose of returning an indictment.’ 

The only witnesses were members of law enforcement, and each grand jury heard evidence only for one day, he wrote. 

‘Second, the evidence put before the Maxwell grand juries is today, with only very minor exceptions, a matter of public record,’ Engelmayer continued. ‘The Government admitted as much.’ 

In addition to transcripts of grand jury testimony, the Justice Department also wanted to unseal additional evidence presented as exhibits to the grand jurors. They were expected to include more names than have been publicly associated with the latter in criminal and civil court proceedings. 

But Engelmayer denied the government’s request for the exhibits, too. 

Fox News’ Ashley Oliver contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Previous Post

Climate group scrubs judges’ names from website after unearthed chats unmasked cozy ties

Next Post

S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

Next Post
S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

S&P 500 Breaking Out Again: What This Means for Your Portfolio

    Sign up for our newsletter to receive the latest insights, updates, and exclusive content straight to your inbox! Whether it's industry news, expert advice, or inspiring stories, we bring you valuable information that you won't find anywhere else. Stay connected with us!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 strategicwealthpro.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Business
    • Politics
    • Investing
    • Stocks

    Copyright © 2025 strategicwealthpro.com | All Rights Reserved